|
A
case has been filed against the Company by a certain
party in January 2000, praying among other things,
a declaration that the Company is not entitled to
withhold or disrupt the functioning of the interconnection
agreement between the said party and the Company and
a declaration that the Company is not entitled to
block, discriminate, congest, restrict or interfere
with the calls transferred from the network of the
party concerned. |
|
|
A
case has been filed against the Company by a certain
other party in January 2000, praying among other things,
a declaration that the Company has no right to block
or disrupt numbers assigned by the party concerned. |
|
|
|
|
|
An
internet service provider has filed action against
the Company, claiming Rs. 1,500 million as damages
for defamation arising out of an advertisement placed
by the Company. |
|
|
|
|
|
The
Company has instituted action against a certain party
in May 2000, praying among other things, a declaration
that the said party is not entitled to use or permit
its telecommunication network to be used to provide
international telephony/telephonic services and damages
amounting to Rs. 102,008,120 |
|
|
|
|
|
The
Company has also instituted action against a certain
other party in May 2000 praying among other things
that, a declaration that the party concerned is not
entitled to use or permit its telecommunications network
to be used to allow foreign calls to terminate in
Sri Lanka without coming through the international
gateway of the Company, to allow calls to a recipient
abroad without going through the international gateway
of the Company, to have connection services with any
other network other than the network of the Company
for international telephony/telephonic services and
for damages amounting to Rs. 174,518,740. |
|
|
|
|
|
The
damages to SLTL equipment in 2000 resulting from the
military conflict in the Northern Province is estimated
at Rs. 10 million. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|